ArticleHeliyon2023
Validity of Food insecurity experience scale (FIES) for use in rural Bangladesh and prevalence and determinants of household food insecurity: An analysis of data from Bangladesh integrated household survey (BIHS) 2018-2019.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food Insecurity in Peru: Measurement Properties of the FIES and Prevalence Estimates from the 2025 Household Survey.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Minimum acceptable diet and its associated factors among children aged 6-23months in rural households of South Ethiopia.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of the food insecurity experience scale (FIES) among adults.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Dying of starvation if not from bombs: assessing measurement properties of the Food Insecurity Experiences Scale (FIES) in Gaza's civilian population experiencing the world's worst hunger crisis.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Food insecurity and health conditions in the Australian adult population: A nationally representative analysis.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025Article
- Are remittances a buffer against food insecurity? Lessons from a national survey in Bangladesh.PloS one · 2025Article
- Uncovering the drivers of food insecurity in Cameroon: insights from a nationwide cross-sectional analysis.BMC nutrition · 2024Article
- Methodology for developing and validating Bangladesh healthy eating index: A study protocol.PloS one · 2024Article
- Intra-household joint decision making on child feeding and associated social determinants in rural districts of South Ethiopia: a multi-site concurrent mixed method study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
"Access" dimension of Food insecurity (FI) is directly measured by the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES). The current study assessed the appropriateness of the FIES for measuring FI in rural Bangladesh, followed by an assessment of FI prevalence and its correlates utilizing Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey (BIHS) data. The internal validity of the FIES and the prevalence of FI were investigated using the Rasch modeling approach. We utilized equating procedure to calibrate the study's result to the global FIES reference scale and determined FI prevalence rates that were comparable across countries. The external validity of the FIES was evaluated by examining its association with other FI measures using Spearman's rho correlation analysis. With an overall Rasch reliability of 0.84, the FIES met the Rasch model assumptions of conditional independence and equal discrimination, and as well as the fit statistics standards for all eight items. Infit statistics were within the allowed limit for all FIES items indicating good internal validity. However, we noted a high outfit (>2) for the "unable to eat healthy and nutritious food" item indicating the presence of some unusual response patterns. Our analysis found no significant (>0.4) correlation between FIES items. We also found a significant correlation between FIES and other FI proxies, e.g., the Household hunger scale (HHS), Food consumption score (FCS), and Household dietary diversity score (HDDS). Overall, the prevalence of moderate or severe FI was 18.92% in rural Bangladesh. Geographic areas, access to electricity, household ownership, access to sanitation, livestock ownership, family size, education level, and monthly per capita food expenditure significantly explained the variation in FI. Our analyses suggest that the FIES is internally and externally valid for FI measurement in rural Bangladesh. However, FIES questions may need to be reordered to more accurately evaluate lower levels of FI, and the item "unable to eat healthy and nutritious food" may need cognitive testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.