Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37426767›Full record

ArticleHIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Prevalence of HIV in Kazakhstan 2010-2020 and Its Forecasting for the Next 10 Years.

Kamilla Mussina, Shirali Kadyrov, Ardak Kashkynbayev, Sauran Yerdessov, Gulnur Zhakhina, Yesbolat Sakko, Amin Zollanvari, Abduzhappar Gaipov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kamilla MussinaDepartment of Medicine, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-2146-3111
Shirali KadyrovDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Suleyman Demirel University, Kaskelen, Kazakhstan.
Ardak KashkynbayevDepartment of Mathematics, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Sauran YerdessovDepartment of Medicine, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Gulnur ZhakhinaDepartment of Medicine, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Yesbolat SakkoDepartment of Medicine, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-1694-2399
Amin ZollanvariDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Abduzhappar GaipovDepartment of Medicine, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-9844-8772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: HIV is a growing public health burden that threatens thousands of people in Kazakhstan. Countries around the world, including Kazakhstan, are facing significant problems in predicting HIV infection prevalence. It is crucial to understand the epidemiological trends of infectious diseases and to monitor the prevalence of HIV in a long-term perspective. Thus, in this study, we aimed to forecast the prevalence of HIV in Kazakhstan for 10 years from 2020 to 2030 by using mathematical modeling and time series analysis. Methods: We use statistical Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models and a nonlinear epidemic Susceptible-Infected (SI) model to forecast the HIV infection prevalence rate in Kazakhstan. We estimated the parameters of the models using open data on the prevalence of HIV infection among women and men (aged 15-49 years) in Kazakhstan provided by the Kazakhstan Bureau of National Statistics. We also predict the effect of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) control measures on the prevalence rate. Results: The ARIMA (1,2,0) model suggests that the prevalence of HIV infection in Kazakhstan will increase from 0.29 in 2021 to 0.47 by 2030. On the other hand, the SI model suggests that this parameter will increase to 0.60 by 2030 based on the same data. Both models were statistically significant by Akaike Information Criterion corrected (AICc) score and by the goodness of fit. HIV prevention under the PrEP strategy on the SI model showed a significant effect on the reduction of the HIV prevalence rate. Conclusion: This study revealed that ARIMA (1,2,0) predicts a linear increasing trend, while SI forecasts a nonlinear increase with a higher prevalence of HIV. Therefore, it is recommended for healthcare providers and policymakers use this model to calculate the cost required for the regional allocation of healthcare resources. Moreover, this model can be used for planning effective healthcare treatments.

Indexed as

ARIMA modelforecastingHIVprevalenceSI model

Identifiers

PMID37426767
PMCPMC10329475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.