Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37426633›Full record

ReviewCurrent forestry reports2023

Quantifying the Effect Size of Management Actions on Aboveground Carbon Stocks in Forest Plantations.

Cyril H Melikov, Jacob J Bukoski, Susan C Cook-Patton, Hongyi Ban, Jessica L Chen, Matthew D Potts

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current forestry reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cyril H MelikovEnvironmental Defense Fund, New York, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8668-1577
Jacob J BukoskiMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-5023
Susan C Cook-PattonThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-4397
Hongyi BanDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9004-7651
Jessica L ChenDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5451-9540
Matthew D PottsDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7442-3944
University of California, Berkeley · USCarbon180 · USEnvironmental Defense Fund · USOregon State University · USThe Nature Conservancy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of the Review: Improved forest management is a promising avenue for climate change mitigation. However, we lack synthetic understanding of how different management actions impact aboveground carbon stocks, particularly at scales relevant for designing and implementing forest-based climate solutions. Here, we quantitatively assess and review the impacts of three common practices-application of inorganic NPK fertilizer, interplanting with N-fixing species, and thinning-on aboveground carbon stocks in plantation forests. Recent Findings: Site-level empirical studies show both positive and negative effects of inorganic fertilization, interplanting, and thinning on aboveground carbon stocks in plantation forests. Recent findings and the results of our analysis suggest that these effects are heavily moderated by factors such as species selection, precipitation, time since practice, soil moisture regime, and previous land use. Interplanting of N-fixing crops initially has no effect on carbon storage in main tree crops, but the effect becomes positive in older stands. Conversely, the application of NPK fertilizers increases aboveground carbon stocks, though the effect lessens with time. Moreover, increases in aboveground carbon stocks may be partially or completely offset by emissions from the application of inorganic fertilizer. Thinning results in a strong reduction of aboveground carbon stocks, though the effect lessens with time. Summary: Management practices tend to have strong directional effects on aboveground carbon stocks in plantation forests but are moderated by site-specific management, climatic, and edaphic factors. The effect sizes quantified in our meta-analysis can serve as benchmarks for the design and scoping of improved forest management projects as forest-based climate solutions. Overall, management actions can enhance the climate mitigation potential of plantation forests, if performed with sufficient attention to the nuances of local conditions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40725-023-00182-5.

Indexed as

CarbonFertilizationForest plantationImproved forest managementNatural climate solutionsThinning

Identifiers

PMID37426633
PMCPMC10328870
OpenAlexW4364378020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.