ArticleOpen life sciences2023
Evaluation of effects of small-incision approach treatment on proximal tibia fracture by deep learning algorithm-based magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Open life sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on a deep learning algorithm was used to evaluate the clinical effect of the small-incision approach in treating proximal tibial fractures. Super-resolution reconstruction (SRR) algorithm was used to reconstruct MRI images for analysis and comparison. The research objects were 40 patients with proximal tibial fractures. According to the random number method, patients were divided into a small-incision approach group (22 cases) and an ordinary approach group (18 cases). The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and the structural similarity index (SSIM) of the MRI images before and after the reconstruction of the two groups were analyzed. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, complete weight-bearing time, complete healing time, knee range of motion, and knee function of the two treatments were compared. The results showed that after SRR, the PSNR and SSIM of MRI images were 35.28 and 0.826 dB, respectively, so the MRI image display effect was better. The operation time in the small-incision approach group was 84.93 min, which was significantly shorter than that in the common approach group, and the intraoperative blood loss was 219.95 mL, which was significantly shorter than that in the common approach group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.