ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2023
Gemcitabine as first-line therapy for high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: results from a tertiary center in the contemporary BCG-shortage era.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing the Nucleoside Analog Response with Translational Therapeutic Approaches to Overcome Resistance.Cells · 2026Review
- The clinical landscape of bladder cancer treatment: a brief report on new developments and future perspectives in pharmaceutical interventions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Intravesical Gemcitabine for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer after Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Treatment Failure: A Prospective Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Therapy for BCG-Naïve Patients: A Promising Approach to Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the safety profile and efficacy of intravesical gemcitabine as first-line adjuvant therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in the setting of ongoing Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage. Methods: We performed an institutional, retrospective review of patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine induction and maintenance therapy from March 2019 to October 2021. Patients with intermediate or high-risk NMIBC who were BCG-naïve or experienced a high-grade (HG) recurrence after 12 months since the last dose of BCG were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at the 3-month visit. Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and assessment of adverse events. Results: A total of 33 patients were included. All had HG disease and 28 (84.8%) were BCG-naive. The median follow-up was 21.4 months (range, 4.1-39.4). Tumor stages were cTa in 39.4%, cT1 in 54.5%, and cTis in 6.1% of patients. Most patients (90.9%) were in the AUA high-risk category. The 3-month CR was 84.8%. Among patients who achieved CR with adequate follow-up, 86.9% (20/23) remained disease-free at 6 months. The 6-month and 12-month RFS were 87.2% and 76.5%, respectively. The estimated median RFS was not reached. Approximately 78.8% of patients were able to complete full induction. Common adverse events (incidence ≥10%) included dysuria and fatigue/myalgia. Conclusions: Intravesical gemcitabine for intermediate and high-risk NMIBC in areas where BCG supply is limited was safe and feasible at short-term follow-up. Larger prospective studies are needed to better ascertain the oncologic efficacy of gemcitabine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.