ArticleCrystal growth & design2023
Rapid Assessment of Crystal Nucleation and Growth Kinetics: Comparison of Seeded and Unseeded Experiments.
Article in Crystal growth & design, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Grain-Size-Controlled Resistive Switching Memories Enabling Domain-Specific Functionality for Real-Time Video Signal Processing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Fluid shear driven secondary nucleation using α-and γ-glycine seeds confirmed with rigorous control experiments.CrystEngComm · 2026Article
- Development and optimization of a novel spectroscopic method to monitor crystallization behavior of BCS-II drug.Turkish journal of chemistry · 2026Article
- A chronological study on formation mechanism of nesquehonite from nanoparticles to grown crystals and its application in nanoparticle synthesis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Developing a Vial-Scale Methodology for the Measurement of Nucleation Kinetics Using Evaporative Crystallization: A Case Study with Sodium Chloride.Crystal growth & design · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we outlined an experimental workflow enabling the rapid assessment of primary and secondary nucleation and crystal growth kinetics. We used small-scale experiments in agitated vials with in situ imaging for crystal counting and sizing to quantify nucleation and growth kinetics of α-glycine in aqueous solutions as a function of supersaturation at isothermal conditions. Seeded experiments were required to assess crystallization kinetics when primary nucleation is too slow, especially at lower supersaturations often encountered in continuous crystallization processes. At higher supersaturations, we compared results from seeded and unseeded experiments and carefully analyzed interdependencies of primary and secondary nucleation and growth kinetics. This approach allows for the rapid estimation of absolute values of primary and secondary nucleation and growth rates without relying on any specific assumptions about functional forms of corresponding rate expressions used for estimation approaches based on fitting population balance models. Quantitative relationships between nucleation and growth rates at given conditions provide useful insights into crystallization behavior and can be explored to rationally manipulate crystallization conditions for achieving desirable outcomes in batch or continuous crystallization processes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.