Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37426448›Full record

ArticleCardiology research and practice2023

Long-Term Outcomes of Bovine versus Porcine Mitral Valve Replacement: A Multicenter Analysis.

M Broadwin, N Ramkumar, D J Malenka, R D Quinn, C S Ross, F Hirashima, J D Klemperer, R S Kramer, G L Sardella, B Westbrook and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

M BroadwinDepartment of Surgery, Lehigh Valley Health Network, 1200 South Ceder Crest Blvd, PA 18103, Allentown, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0393-9983
N RamkumarGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, NH 03755, Hanover, USA.
D J MalenkaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, NH 03756, Lebanon, USA.
R D QuinnDepartment of Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, ME 04102, Portland, USA.
C S RossDepartment of Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, NH 03756, Lebanon, USA.
F HirashimaDepartment of Surgery, Section of Cardiac Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Avenue, VT 05401, Burlington, USA.
J D KlempererNorthern Light Cardiology, Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center, 417 State Street, ME 04401, Bangor, USA.
R S KramerDepartment of Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, ME 04102, Portland, USA.
G L SardellaDepartment of Surgery, Catholic Medical Center, 100 McGregor Street, NH 03102, Manchester, USA.
B WestbrookDepartment of Surgery, Catholic Medical Center, 100 McGregor Street, NH 03102, Manchester, USA.
A W DiscipioDepartment of Surgery, Section of Cardiac Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, NH 03756, Lebanon, USA.
A IribarneDepartment of Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Staten Island University Hospital at Northwell Health, 475 Seaview Avenue, NY 10305, Staten Island, USA.
M P RobichJohns Hopkins Hospital, Division of Cardiac Surgery, 1800 Orleans St, Zayed 7107, MD 21287, Baltimore, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9579-2765
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USCatholic Medical Center · USMaine Medical Center · USDartmouth College · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USLehigh Valley Hospital-Pocono · USNorthwell Health · USState Street (United States) · USUniversity of Vermont Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recent national guidelines recommending mitral valve replacement (MVR) for severe secondary mitral regurgitation have resulted in an increased utilization of mitral bioprosthesis. There is a paucity of data on how longitudinal clinical outcomes vary by prosthesis type. We examined long-term survival and risk of reoperation between patients having bovine vs. porcine MVR. Results: In the overall cohort, patients receiving porcine valves were more likely to have diabetes (19% bovine vs. 29% porcine; Conclusions: In this multicenter analysis of patients undergoing bioprosthetic MVR, there was no difference in perioperative complications and risk of reoperation of long-term survival after matching.

Identifiers

PMID37426448
PMCPMC10328727
OpenAlexW4382790183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.