Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37426432›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2023

Alzheimer's disease: a mini-review for the clinician.

Rishi S Madnani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Investigating the Potential of Essential Oils fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rishi S MadnaniBates College, Lewiston, ME, United States.
Bates College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, is a striking example of the connection between neurophysiological abnormalities and higher-order cognitive deficiencies. Since its initial description in 1906, research into the pathophysiology and etiology of AD has led to the illumination of an incredibly complex set of genetic and molecular mechanisms for the disease's progression, characterized by much more than the neuropathological hallmarks of beta-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). In this review, findings relating the neurodegeneration present in AD to its clinical presentation and treatment are summarized, with an emphasis on the interconnectedness of disease pathophysiology. Further, diagnostic guidelines are provided based on the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) workgroup's clinical recommendations. Through the dissemination of detailed but digestible open access resources such as this one, we can move towards an increase in the equity and accessibility of education for the modern clinician.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasediagnosishistorymedicineneurodegenerationpathophysiology

Identifiers

PMID37426432
PMCPMC10325860
OpenAlexW4381889639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.