ArticleCureus2023
Transforming Medical Education: Assessing the Integration of ChatGPT Into Faculty Workflows at a Caribbean Medical School.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- ChatGPT as a tool for reviewing multiple-choice questions in the health sector.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Opportunities and Challenges of Generative AI in Postgraduate Health Professions Education Assessments From Educator and Learner Perspectives: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Hybrid Case-Based Learning and Small-Group Teaching Model Using Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Case Generation: An Innovative Dental Education Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Applications, Challenges, and Prospects of Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowering Medical Education: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Performance of artificial intelligence chatbots in National dental licensing examination.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models in Medical Education - Scoping Literature Review.Medical science educator · 2025Review
- Engine of Innovation in Hospital Pharmacy: Applications and Reflections of ChatGPT.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Article
- ChatGPT as a Tool for Medical Education and Clinical Decision-Making on the Wards: Case Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Article
- ChatGPT-3.5 System Usability Scale early assessment among Healthcare Workers: Horizons of adoption in medical practice.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Prompted Explanations of Common Primary Care Diagnoses.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChatGPT is a Large Language Model (LLM) which allows for natural language processing and interactions with users in a conversational style. Since its release in 2022, it has had a significant impact in many occupational fields, including medical education. We sought to gain insight into the extent and type of usage of ChatGPT at a Caribbean medical school, the American University of Antigua College of Medicine (AUA).
methodsWe administered a questionnaire to 87 full-time faculty at the school via email. We quantified and made graphical representations of the results via Qualtrics Experience Management software (QualtricsXM, Qualtrics, Provo, UT). Survey results were investigated using bar graph comparisons of absolute numbers and percentages for various categories related to ChatGPT usage, and descriptive statistics for Likert scale questions.
resultsWe found an estimated 33% of faculty were currently using ChatGPT. There was broad acceptance of the program by those who were using it and most believed it should be an option for students. The primary task ChatGPT was being used for was multiple choice question (MCQ) generation. The primary concern faculty had was incorrect information being included in ChatGPT output.
conclusionChatGPT has been quickly adopted by a subset of the college faculty, demonstrating its growing acceptance. Given the level of approval expressed about the program, we believe ChatGPT will continue to form an important and expanding part of faculty workflows at AUA and in medical education in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.