ArticleCancer management and research2023
CXCL12 and CXCR4 as Potential Early Biomarkers for Luminal A and Luminal B Subtypes of Breast Cancer.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating soluble CXCR4 fails to differentiate subtypes of primary aldosteronism.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Utility of Selected Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-11, MMP-26), HE4, CA125 and ROMA Algorithm in Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common type of malignancy in women. Factors that increase the risk of occurrence include chronic inflammation, with chemokines as its mediators. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine the diagnostic utility of CXCL12 and CXCR4 as modern tumor markers in patients with early-stage luminal A and luminal B subtype of breast cancer and also to compare the results with the routinely used marker - CA 15-3. Patients and Methods: The study included 100 patients with early breast cancer of luminal A and B subtypes, 50 women with benign breast lesion and 50 healthy women. The levels of CXCL12 and CXCR4 concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), comparative marker CA 15-3 - by electrochemiluminescence method (ECLIA). Results: Concentrations of CXCL12 were significantly lower, while CXCR4 and CA 15-3 - significantly higher among patients with early-stage breast cancer than healthy women. CXCL12 also showed lower concentrations among Conclusion: The results indicate the preliminary usefulness of CXCL12 and CXCR4 as early biomarkers in the diagnosis of breast cancer, especially in the combined panel with CA 15-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.