ArticleDermatology reports2023
Real-world use of dimethyl fumarate in patients with plaque psoriasis: a Delphi-based expert consensus.
Article in Dermatology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elective First-Line Use of Dimethyl Fumarate in Psoriasis: Insights from an Italian Cohort.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
- Unlocking Novel Therapeutic Potential of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- How Cells Die in Psoriasis?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Exploring Psoriasis Inflammatory Microenvironment by NanoString Technologies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) was recently approved by the European Medicines Agency for systemic treatment of moderateto- severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Appropriate management of DMF treatment is required to achieve optimal clinical benefits. 7 dermatology experts gathered online for 3 meetings to identify consensus on the use of DMF in patient selection, drug dosage/titration, side effects management, and follow-up, with the aim to provide guidance on the use of DMF for psoriasis in clinical dermatological practice based on literature data and expert opinion. 20 statements were discussed and voted on using a facilitator- mediated modified Delphi methodology. Strong consensus was reached for all statements (agreement level of 100%). DMF treatment is characterized by dosage flexibility, sustained efficacy, high rates of drug survival, and low potential for drug-drug interactions. It can be used in a broad range of patients, including the elderly or those with comorbidities. Side effects (mainly gastrointestinal disorders, flushing, and lymphopenia) are frequently reported but are generally mild and transient and can be minimized by dosage adjustments and a slow titration schedule. Hematologic monitoring throughout the treatment course is required to reduce the risk of lymphopenia. This consensus document provides clinical dermatologists with answers on the optimal use of DMF to treat psoriasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.