ArticleACS omega2023
High-Efficiency Water Filtration by Electrospun Expanded Polystyrene Waste Nanofibers.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scalable and Systematical Conversions of Domestic Wastes to Core-Sheath Nanofibers for Photocatalytic Degradation of Antibiotics.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Electro-Spun Waste Polystyrene/Steel Slag Composite Membrane for Water Desalination: Modelling and Photothermal Activity Evaluation.Membranes · 2025Article
- Recycled Polystyrene as a Sustainable Material for Hollow Fiber Membranes in Dye Filtration.Membranes · 2025Article
- Asymmetric Membranes Obtained from Sulfonated HIPS Waste with Potential Application in Wastewater Treatment.Membranes · 2024Article
- Sustainability in Membrane Technology: Membrane Recycling and Fabrication Using Recycled Waste.Membranes · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanofiber membranes were successfully synthesized from expanded polystyrene (EPS) waste with the addition of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) for water microfiltration using the electrospinning method. The EPS-based nanofiber membranes exhibited a smooth morphology and were uniform in size. The concentration of the EPS/PVP solution changed some of the physical parameters of the nanofiber membrane, such as viscosity, conductivity, and surface tension. Greater viscosity and surface tension increase the nanofiber membrane diameter, whereas the addition of PVP results in hydrophilicity. Additionally, increasing the pressure increased the flux value of each variation of the nanofiber membranes. Furthermore, the rejection value was 99.99% for all variations. Finally, the use of EPS waste for nanofiber membranes is also beneficial for decreasing the amount of EPS waste in the environment and is an alternative to the current membranes available in the market for water filtration applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.