Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37426217›Full record

ReviewACS omega2023

Comprehensive Review on the Role of Plant Protein As a Possible Meat Analogue: Framing the Future of Meat.

Shubhangi Arora, Priyanka Kataria, Mansi Nautiyal, Ishika Tuteja, Vaishnavi Sharma, Faraz Ahmad, Shafiul Haque, Moyad Shahwan, Esra Capanoglu, Rahul Vashishth and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Plant-Based Alternatives to Meat Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Exploring Sustainable Future Protein Sources.Food science of animal resources · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shubhangi AroraDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Bell Road, Clement Town Dehradun, 248002 Uttrakhand, India.
Priyanka KatariaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Bell Road, Clement Town Dehradun, 248002 Uttrakhand, India.
Mansi NautiyalDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Bell Road, Clement Town Dehradun, 248002 Uttrakhand, India.
Ishika TutejaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Bell Road, Clement Town Dehradun, 248002 Uttrakhand, India.
Vaishnavi SharmaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Bell Road, Clement Town Dehradun, 248002 Uttrakhand, India.
Faraz AhmadDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bio Science and Technology (SBST), Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Shafiul HaqueResearch and Scientific Studies Unit, College of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2989-121X
Moyad ShahwanCentre of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Esra CapanogluDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0335-9433
Rahul VashishthDepartment of Biosciences, School of Bio Science and Technology (SBST), Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-2888
Arun Kumar GuptaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Bell Road, Clement Town Dehradun, 248002 Uttrakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal proteins from meat and goods derived from meat have recently been one of the primary concerns in the quest for sustainable food production. According to this perspective, there are exciting opportunities to reformulate more sustainably produced meat products that may also have health benefits by partially replacing meat with nonmeat substances high in protein. Considering these pre-existing conditions, this review critically summarizes recent findings on extenders from a variety of sources, including pulses, plant-based ingredients, plant byproducts, and unconventional sources. It views these findings as a valuable opportunity to improve the technological profile and functional quality of meat, with a focus on their ability to affect the sustainability of meat products. As a result, meat substitutes like plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs), meat made from fungi, and cultured meat are being offered to encourage sustainability.

Identifiers

PMID37426217
PMCPMC10323939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.