Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37426104›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Interpretation of deep non-linear factorization for autism.

Boran Chen, Bo Yin, Hengjin Ke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Boran Chen *Computer School (Huangshi Key Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence), Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi, China.
Bo Yin *Computer School (Huangshi Key Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence), Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi, China.
Hengjin KeComputer School (Huangshi Key Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence), Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism, a neurodevelopmental disorder, presents significant challenges for diagnosis and classification. Despite the widespread use of neural networks in autism classification, the interpretability of their models remains a crucial issue. This study aims to address this concern by investigating the interpretability of neural networks in autism classification using the deep symbolic regression and brain network interpretative methods. Specifically, we analyze publicly available autism fMRI data using our previously developed Deep Factor Learning model on a Hibert Basis tensor (HB-DFL) method and extend the interpretative Deep Symbolic Regression method to identify dynamic features from factor matrices, construct brain networks from generated reference tensors, and facilitate the accurate diagnosis of abnormal brain network activity in autism patients by clinicians. Our experimental results show that our interpretative method effectively enhances the interpretability of neural networks and identifies crucial features for autism classification.

Indexed as

autismbrain networkdeep symbolic regressionfactorizationfMRIinterpretation

Identifiers

PMID37426104
PMCPMC10325632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.