Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37426058›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2023

Shattering the Attentional Window: What Really Determines Capture by Abrupt Onsets and Color Singletons?

Mei-Ching Lien, Eric Ruthruff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The temporal dynamics of visual attention.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mei-Ching LienSchool of Psychological Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0032-223X
Eric RuthruffDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3948-3738

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is emerging evidence that suppressing distractors occur to prevent capture by those distractors. Theeuwes (2022) claimed that the absence of capture is not because of suppression but rather because a difficult, serial search causes salient distractors to fall outside of the attentional window. Here, we question this attentional window view by describing evidence that (a) for color singletons, capture fails to occur with an easy search, and (b) for abrupt onsets, capture does occur in a difficult search. We argue that the critical factor determining capture by salient distractors is not the attentional window or search difficulty but rather target search mode (singleton vs. nonsingleton).

Indexed as

attentional windowAttention capturefeature searchsingleton detectiontarget search mode

Identifiers

PMID37426058
PMCPMC10327852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.