Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37426040›Full record

ArticleJournal of machine learning research : JMLR2021

Integrative High Dimensional Multiple Testing with Heterogeneity under Data Sharing Constraints.

Molei Liu, Yin Xia, Kelly Cho, Tianxi Cai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of machine learning research : JMLR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Novel Approach of High Dimensional Linear Hypothesis Testing Problem.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Robust Inference for Federated Meta-Learning.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Molei LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, USA.
Yin XiaDepartment of Statistics, School of Management, Fudan University, China.
Kelly ChoMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, US Department of Veteran Affairs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA.
Tianxi CaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Optimizing Personalized Treatment SelectionR01HL089778 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LU TIAN · 2008 to 2026
$4.8M
Semi-supervised Approaches to Denoising Electronic Health Records Data for Risk PredictionR01LM013614 · NLM · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI CAI, TIANXI, GUO, ZIJIAN · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089778NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying informative predictors in a high dimensional regression model is a critical step for association analysis and predictive modeling. Signal detection in the high dimensional setting often fails due to the limited sample size. One approach to improving power is through meta-analyzing multiple studies which address the same scientific question. However, integrative analysis of high dimensional data from multiple studies is challenging in the presence of between-study heterogeneity. The challenge is even more pronounced with additional data sharing constraints under which only summary data can be shared across different sites. In this paper, we propose a novel data shielding integrative large-scale testing (DSILT) approach to signal detection allowing between-study heterogeneity and not requiring the sharing of individual level data. Assuming the underlying high dimensional regression models of the data differ across studies yet share similar support, the proposed method incorporates proper integrative estimation and debiasing procedures to construct test statistics for the overall effects of specific covariates. We also develop a multiple testing procedure to identify significant effects while controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) and false discovery proportion (FDP). Theoretical comparisons of the new testing procedure with the ideal individual-level meta-analysis (ILMA) approach and other distributed inference methods are investigated. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed testing procedure performs well in both controlling false discovery and attaining power. The new method is applied to a real example detecting interaction effects of the genetic variants for statins and obesity on the risk for type II diabetes.

Indexed as

DebiasingDistributed learningFalse discovery rateHigh dimensional inferenceIntegrative analysisMultiple testing

Identifiers

PMID37426040
PMCPMC10327421
OpenAlexW3014942367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.