Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37426003›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2023

Microbiomes in the context of developing sustainable intensified aquaculture.

Marlene Lorgen-Ritchie, Tamsyn Uren Webster, Jamie McMurtrie, David Bass, Charles R Tyler, Andrew Rowley, Samuel A M Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chlorogenic Acid Improves Intestinal Health in Largemouth Bass (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The pathogenesis ofParasitology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marlene Lorgen-RitchieSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Tamsyn Uren WebsterCentre for Sustainable Aquatic Research, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Jamie McMurtrieCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
David BassCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Charles R TylerCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Andrew RowleyDepartment of Biosciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Samuel A M MartinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an ever-growing human population, the need for sustainable production of nutritional food sources has never been greater. Aquaculture is a key industry engaged in active development to increase production in line with this need while remaining sustainable in terms of environmental impact and promoting good welfare and health in farmed species. Microbiomes fundamentally underpin animal health, being a key part of their digestive, metabolic and defense systems, in the latter case protecting against opportunistic pathogens in the environment. The potential to manipulate the microbiome to the advantage of enhancing health, welfare and production is an intriguing prospect that has gained considerable traction in recent years. In this review we first set out what is known about the role of the microbiome in aquaculture production systems across the phylogenetic spectrum of cultured animals, from invertebrates to finfish. With a view to reducing environmental footprint and tightening biological and physical control, investment in "closed" aquaculture systems is on the rise, but little is known about how the microbial systems of these closed systems affect the health of cultured organisms. Through comparisons of the microbiomes and their dynamics across phylogenetically distinct animals and different aquaculture systems, we focus on microbial communities in terms of their functionality in order to identify what features within these microbiomes need to be harnessed for optimizing healthy intensified production in support of a sustainable future for aquaculture.

Indexed as

functionalityhealthimmune systemmicrobiotasustainability

Identifiers

PMID37426003
PMCPMC10327644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.