Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425740›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Implicit reward-based motor learning.

Nina M van Mastrigt, Jonathan S Tsay, Tianhe Wang, Guy Avraham, Sabrina J Abram, Katinka van der Kooij, Jeroen B J Smeets, Richard B Ivry

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nina M van MastrigtVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8531-9568
Jonathan S TsayUC Berkeley, CognAc lab, Berkeley, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-9023
Tianhe WangUC Berkeley, CognAc lab, Berkeley, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0131-850X
Guy AvrahamUC Berkeley, CognAc lab, Berkeley, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6170-1041
Sabrina J AbramUC Berkeley, CognAc lab, Berkeley, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5740-1874
Katinka van der KooijVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4190-7827
Jeroen B J SmeetsVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3794-0579
Richard B IvryUC Berkeley, CognAc lab, Berkeley, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4728-5130

Funding

Human Cerebellar Function in Multiple Task DomainsR35NS116883 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RICHARD IVRY · 2020 to 2026
$5.3M
Specifying the constraints on cerebellar dependent sensorimotor adaptationR01NS105839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IVRY, RICHARD · 2018 to 2019
$709k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105839NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS116883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binary feedback, providing information solely about task success or failure, can be sufficient to drive motor learning. While binary feedback can induce explicit adjustments in movement strategy, it remains unclear if this type of feedback also induce implicit learning. We examined this question in a center-out reaching task by gradually moving an invisible reward zone away from a visual target to a final rotation of 7.5° or 25° in a between-group design. Participants received binary feedback, indicating if the movement intersected the reward zone. By the end of the training, both groups modified their reach angle by about 95% of the rotation. We quantified implicit learning by measuring performance in a subsequent no-feedback aftereffect phase, in which participants were told to forgo any adopted movement strategies and reach directly to the visual target. The results showed a small, but robust (2-3°) aftereffect in both groups, highlighting that binary feedback elicits implicit learning. Notably, for both groups, reaches to two flanking generalization targets were biased in the same direction as the aftereffect. This pattern is at odds with the hypothesis that implicit learning is a form of use-dependent learning. Rather, the results suggest that binary feedback can be sufficient to recalibrate a sensorimotor map.

Identifiers

PMID37425740
PMCPMC10327077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.