Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425739›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Closed-loop optogenetic perturbation of macaque oculomotor cerebellum: evidence for an internal saccade model.

Robijanto Soetedjo, Gregory D Horwitz

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robijanto SoetedjoDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3776-857X
Gregory D HorwitzDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5130-5259
University of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
YILMA SIV VACCINIA VACCINE TRIALP51RR000166 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HU, SHIU-LOK · 1985 to 2011
$161.1M
Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAUREEN E NEITZ · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Saccade motor control: The role of cerebellum in spatial updating of saccadesR01EY028902 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SOETEDJO, ROBIJANTO · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Neural mechanisms of visual contrast sensitivityR01EY030441 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HORWITZ, GREGORY D · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000166NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028902NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030441NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internal models are essential for the production of accurate movements. The accuracy of saccadic eye movements is thought to be mediated by an internal model of oculomotor mechanics encoded in the cerebellum. The cerebellum may also be part of a feedback loop that predicts the displacement of the eyes and compares it to the desired displacement in real time to ensure that saccades land on target. To investigate the role of the cerebellum in these two aspects of saccade production, we delivered saccade-triggered light pulses to channelrhodopsin-2-expressing Purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis (OMV) of two macaque monkeys. Light pulses delivered during the acceleration phase of ipsiversive saccades slowed the deceleration phase. The long latency of these effects and their scaling with light pulse duration are consistent with an integration of neural signals at or downstream of the stimulation site. In contrast, light pulses delivered during contraversive saccades reduced saccade velocity at short latency and were followed by a compensatory reacceleration which caused gaze to land near or on the target. We conclude that the contribution of the OMV to saccade production depends on saccade direction; the ipsilateral OMV is part of a forward model that predicts eye displacement, whereas the contralateral OMV is part of an inverse model that creates the force required to move the eyes with optimal peak velocity for the intended displacement.

Identifiers

PMID37425739
PMCPMC10327152
OpenAlexW4382048826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.