Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425684›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Propofol Mediated Unconsciousness Disrupts Progression of Sensory Signals through the Cortical Hierarchy.

John M Tauber, Scott L Brincat, Emily P Stephen, Jacob A Donaghue, Leo Kozachkov, Emery N Brown, Earl K Miller

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John M TauberThe Picower Institute for Learning & Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Scott L BrincatThe Picower Institute for Learning & Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Emily P StephenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Jacob A DonaghueThe Picower Institute for Learning & Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Leo KozachkovDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Emery N BrownThe Picower Institute for Learning & Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Earl K MillerThe Picower Institute for Learning & Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
McGovern Institute for Brain Research · USBoston University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Project 4: Mathematical Modeling Studies of Anesthetic ActionP01GM118269 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KOPELL, NANCY · 2017 to 2021
$9.0M
Non-Human Primate Model for Developing Closed-Loop Anesthesia Delivery SystemsR01NS123120 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI EMERY N BROWN · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM118269NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical component of anesthesia is the loss sensory perception. Propofol is the most widely used drug for general anesthesia, but the neural mechanisms of how and when it disrupts sensory processing are not fully understood. We analyzed local field potential (LFP) and spiking recorded from Utah arrays in auditory cortex, associative cortex, and cognitive cortex of non-human primates before and during propofol mediated unconsciousness. Sensory stimuli elicited robust and decodable stimulus responses and triggered periods of stimulus-induced coherence between brain areas in the LFP of awake animals. By contrast, propofol mediated unconsciousness eliminated stimulus-induced coherence and drastically weakened stimulus responses and information in all brain areas except for auditory cortex, where responses and information persisted. However, we found stimuli occurring during spiking Up states triggered weaker spiking responses than in awake animals in auditory cortex, and little or no spiking responses in higher order areas. These results suggest that propofol's effect on sensory processing is not just due to asynchronous down states. Rather, both Down states and Up states reflect disrupted dynamics.

Identifiers

PMID37425684
PMCPMC10327085
OpenAlexW4382198859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.