ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2020
Systematic Survey of Creatinine-Based Versus Cystatin C-based Estimated GFR in People with Diabetes.
Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Saudi Clinical Practice Guidelines for management of diabetic kidney disease in adults.Saudi medical journal · 2025Guideline
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes is a common cause of kidney failure, and most anti-diabetic agents are excreted through the kidneys. Therefore, it is critical to adjust medication dosage and anti-diabetic agents based on kidney function. There are different methods to estimate kidney function, but the common practice is to use creatinine to estimate the glomerular filtration rate. Objective: In this systematic review, we identify and review publications in order to assess differences between creatinine-based and cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rates in diabetic patients. Methods: The articles were identified using 3 databases and were assessed for eligibility. A total of 4 articles were included. Comparisons of the 2 patient groups as well as the patient characteristics were compiled into 2 tables. Results: Two studies showed significant differences between creatinine-based and cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rates in patients with type 1 diabetes. There were no significant differences in control or type 2 diabetes groups. Conclusions: Although cystatin C-based estimation of kidney function looks promising, it fails to show superiority over creatinine-based estimation. Most studies included in this systematic review, however, had serious limitations to them. Further research with standardized ways of measuring creatinine and cystatin C is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.