ArticleCureus2023
Ethnic Rhinoplasty: A Middle East-Centered Patient Satisfaction Survey Using the FACE-Q Questionnaire.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ethnic Considerations in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes and Complications in Caucasian Versus Non-Caucasian Patients.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Training AI Models for Aesthetic Facial Evaluation: Focused Review and Framework to Mitigate Homogenizing Bias.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- Awareness motivations and barriers related to rhinoplasty among adults in Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessment of Postoperative Satisfaction in Patients Following Rhinoplasty: A Cross-sectional Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Shifting Goals in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Eurocentric Ideals, Ethnic Background, and Cultural Identity.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Ethnic Rhinoplasty in the Brazilian Population: Current Concepts.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Review
- A Novel Approach for Improving Midface Aesthetics: A Pilot Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Rhinoplasty is a common and complex plastic surgery procedure. The evaluation of surgical success in rhinoplasty is primarily based on patient satisfaction. The purpose of the study is to assess the characteristics of patients who underwent rhinoplasty and their satisfaction using the FACE-Q questionnaire. Methodology This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty, septorhinoplasty, or a revision rhinoplasty from 2010 to 2020 at a single center. Patients were asked to complete the FACE-Q nose score pre and postoperatively. Patients also provided information on their sociodemographic characteristics, smoking status, alcohol consumption, number of rhinoplasty procedures, cause of revision, and respiratory symptoms before rhinoplasty. Results This study included 183 patients who underwent rhinoplasty between 2010 and 2020. The mean (SD) age of patients at surgery was 25.92 (8.69) years. There were 156 female respondents (85.2%) and 27 male respondents (14.8%). FACE-Q nose satisfaction scores increased significantly after surgery with a mean of 67.21 ± 22.3 (p = 0.000). The most common reason for revision surgery was tip dissatisfaction. Conclusions The findings of this study show that ethnic rhinoplasty, although a complex procedure, can lead to aesthetically pleasing outcomes in a complex population such as the Middle Eastern population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.