ReviewCureus2023
Nonsurgical Interventions for the Management of Long-Standing Groin Pain in Athletes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Groin Pain Syndrome: Analysis of Surgical and Nonsurgical Outcomes Between Athletes and Nonathletes With "Sports Hernia" Using a Standardized Management Algorithm.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Groin pain is a common problem in athletes, leading to significant distress and long periods of absence from sports. Nonsurgical interventions are usually the first line of treatment. However, the most effective intervention for groin pain is unknown and recommendations are scarce. The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of nonsurgical interventions in the treatment of long-standing groin pain in athletes and to provide some guidance for clinical practice and further research. A search strategy was performed in March 2020 in Pubmed, Google Scholar, PEDro, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, without any time restrictions. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included for full-text analysis. Data on the patient's characteristics, duration of pain, study groups, outcome measures results, follow-up time, and return to play time were extracted. The risk of bias in each study was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. Data for analysis could not be pooled for meta-analysis and, as such, a narrative summary of the outcomes was instead performed. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using a variation of the GRADE approach for when a meta-analysis is not possible to perform. Seven RCTs were included for analysis. Most studies were classified as uncertain risk of bias. All studies provided evidence that nonsurgical interventions have significant positive effects and may lead to good outcomes concerning pain, function, and return to sports at previous levels. The certainty of the evidence was assessed to be low using the modified GRADE approach. Despite the low quality of the available evidence, nonsurgical treatments demonstrated efficacy in the management of groin pain and should probably be the initial approach to treatment. More RCTs of high quality are necessary to provide clear recommendations on the most efficient nonsurgical treatment strategy for groin pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.