Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425530›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Evolving Scope of Clinical Empathy in the Current Era of Medical Practice.

Jayakrishnan B, Jothydev Kesavadev, Abhishek Shrivastava, Banshi Saboo, Brij Mohan Makkar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jayakrishnan BDepartment of Medicine, Educare Institute of Dental Sciences, Malappuram, IND.
Jothydev KesavadevDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Jothydev's Diabetes and Research Center, Trivandrum, IND.
Abhishek ShrivastavaDepartment of Endocrinology, R&R Hormone Clinic, Jabalpur, IND.
Banshi SabooDepartment of Endocrinology, Dia Care, Diabetes Care and Hormone Clinic, Ahmedabad, IND.
Brij Mohan MakkarDepartment of Endocrinology, Dr. Makkar's Diabetes & Obesity Centre, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical empathy is one of the most essential tools of medical practice, and it is an act of correctly acknowledging the emotional state of another without experiencing that state oneself. Empathy comprises four components. Mounting evidence exists to support the use of clinical empathy as a tactic for effective health care. Resolving the multi-fold barriers of clinical empathy is important. Clinical empathy is very important in the current era, and a trust-based relationship in patient care is a way to optimal clinical outcomes that can be achieved through better communication and treatment-compliance plans between health care professionals and patients.

Indexed as

communicationdiabetesdoctor-patientempathysympathy

Identifiers

PMID37425530
PMCPMC10324523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.