ArticleJAMIA open2023
Women's perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in mental healthcare.
Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient trust in the use of machine learning-based clinical decision support systems in psychiatric services: A randomized survey experiment.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024Trial
- Attitudes Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Conjoint Analysis Survey in Singapore.Asian bioethics review · 2026Article
- Patient Preferences for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Public trust of AI in healthcare in South Africa: results of a survey.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- A Cross-sectional Study of Patient Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: A Comparison of Somatic Versus Mental Health Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives on AI for Mental Health Care: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR mental health · 2024Article
- Recentering responsible and explainable artificial intelligence research on patients: implications in perinatal psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate women's attitudes towards artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies used in mental health care. We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey of U.S. adults reporting female sex at birth focused on bioethical considerations for AI-based technologies in mental healthcare, stratifying by previous pregnancy. Survey respondents (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.