Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425485›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2022

Is mpox an STI? The societal aspects and healthcare implications of a key question.

Jaime Garcia Iglesias, Maurice Nagington, Martyn Pickersgill, Michael Brady, Claire Dewsnap, Liz Highleyman, Francisco Javier Membrillo de Novales, Will Nutland, Steven Thrasher, Eric Umar and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Community Involvement in an Outbreak-One Year on for Mpox.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Jaime Garcia IglesiasCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-5635
Maurice NagingtonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4914-0322
Martyn PickersgillCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9807-9148
Michael BradyKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Claire DewsnapSexual Health, Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Liz HighleymanPOZ Magazine, New York City, USA.
Francisco Javier Membrillo de NovalesCBRN and Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Central de la Defensa "Gomez Ulla", Madrid, Spain.
Will NutlandThe Love Tank CIC, London, UK.
Steven ThrasherMedill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA.
Eric UmarKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5269-031X
Ian MuchamoreCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jamie WebbCentre for Technomoral Futures, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
La Trobe University · AUHospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla · ESKamuzu Central Hospital · MWKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBNorthwestern University · USSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This letter explores the societal aspects and healthcare implications that underlie thinking about mpox (formerly known was monkeypox), in the 2022 outbreak, as a sexually transmitted infection (STI). The authors examine what underlies this question, exploring what is an STI, what is sex, and what is the role of stigma in sexual health promotion. The authors argue that, in this specific outbreak, mpox is an STI among men who have sex with men (MSM). The authors highlight the need of critically thinking about how to communicate effectively, the role of homophobia and other inequalities, and the importance of the social sciences.

Indexed as

Monkeypoxpublic healthsexsexual healthsocial sciencesSTI

Identifiers

PMID37425485
PMCPMC10329192
OpenAlexW4383103683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.