ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2023
Polarimetric imaging for cervical pre-cancer screening aided by machine learning:
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Roadmap for light interaction with biophotonic surfaces and their diverse applications.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Retardance and depolarization of brain white matter as markers for intraoperative delineation of brain tumors: experiments and simulations.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Polarimetric feature analysis of Mueller matrices for brain tumor image segmentation.Optics express · 2025Article
- Alignment of histological and polarimetric large-scale imaging for brain tissue characterization.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Machine and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Photodynamic treatment of malignant melanoma with structured light:Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Neu(t)ralMC: energy-efficient open source Monte Carlo algorithm for assessing photon transport in turbid media.Optics express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Wide-field imaging Mueller polarimetry is an optical imaging technique that has great potential to become a reliable, fast, non-contact Aim: We aim to automate/assist with diagnostic segmentation of polarimetric images of uterine cervix specimens. Approach: A comprehensive capture-to-classification pipeline is developed in house. Specimens are acquired and measured with imaging Mueller polarimeter and undergo histopathological classification. Subsequently, a labeled dataset is created within tagged regions of either healthy or neoplastic cervical tissues. Several machine learning methods are trained utilizing different training-test-set-split strategies, and their corresponding accuracies are compared. Results: Our results include robust measurements of model performance with two approaches: a 90:10 training-test-set-split and leave-one-out cross-validation. By comparing the classifier's accuracy directly with the ground truth obtained during histology analysis, we demonstrate how conventionally used shuffled split leads to an over-estimate of true classifier performance Conclusions: Combination of Mueller polarimetry and machine learning is a powerful tool for the task of screening for pre-cancerous conditions in cervical tissue sections. Nevertheless, there is a inherent bias with conventional processes that can be addressed using more conservative classifier training approaches. This results in overall improvements of the sensitivity and specificity of the developed techniques for "unseen" images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.