Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425429›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2023

Polarimetric imaging for cervical pre-cancer screening aided by machine learning:

Demelza Robinson, Kevin Hoong, Willem Bastiaan Kleijn, Alexander Doronin, Jean Rehbinder, Jeremy Vizet, Angelo Pierangelo, Tatiana Novikova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Demelza RobinsonVictoria University of Wellington, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Wellington, New Zealand.
Kevin HoongVictoria University of Wellington, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Wellington, New Zealand.
Willem Bastiaan KleijnVictoria University of Wellington, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Wellington, New Zealand.
Alexander DoroninVictoria University of Wellington, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Wellington, New Zealand.
Jean RehbinderUniversite de Strasbourg, Laboratoire ICube, Illkirch, France.
Jeremy VizetArianeGroup, Les Mureaux, France.
Angelo PierangeloInstitut Polytechnique de Paris, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, LPICM, Palaiseau, France.
Tatiana NovikovaInstitut Polytechnique de Paris, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, LPICM, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9048-9158
Victoria University of Wellington · NZArianespace (France) · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLaboratoire de Physique des Interfaces et des Couches Minces · FRLaboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Wide-field imaging Mueller polarimetry is an optical imaging technique that has great potential to become a reliable, fast, non-contact Aim: We aim to automate/assist with diagnostic segmentation of polarimetric images of uterine cervix specimens. Approach: A comprehensive capture-to-classification pipeline is developed in house. Specimens are acquired and measured with imaging Mueller polarimeter and undergo histopathological classification. Subsequently, a labeled dataset is created within tagged regions of either healthy or neoplastic cervical tissues. Several machine learning methods are trained utilizing different training-test-set-split strategies, and their corresponding accuracies are compared. Results: Our results include robust measurements of model performance with two approaches: a 90:10 training-test-set-split and leave-one-out cross-validation. By comparing the classifier's accuracy directly with the ground truth obtained during histology analysis, we demonstrate how conventionally used shuffled split leads to an over-estimate of true classifier performance Conclusions: Combination of Mueller polarimetry and machine learning is a powerful tool for the task of screening for pre-cancerous conditions in cervical tissue sections. Nevertheless, there is a inherent bias with conventional processes that can be addressed using more conservative classifier training approaches. This results in overall improvements of the sensitivity and specificity of the developed techniques for "unseen" images.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervix UteriEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMachine LearningOptical Imagingcervical cancermachine learningMueller polarimetryoptical diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID37425429
PMCPMC10324511
OpenAlexW4383341801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.