Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425404›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2023

Treatment options and prognosis of patients with lung squamous cell cancer in situ: a comparative study of lung adenocarcinoma in situ and stage IA lung squamous cell cancer.

Kaixuan Zhang, Hao Chen, Yan Jiang, Qiankun Chen, Bo Su, Xiao Zhou

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaixuan Zhang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hao Chen *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yan JiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qiankun ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Bo SuLaboratory Center, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiao ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung squamous cell cancer in situ (LSCIS) is preinvasive squamous tumor and generally overlooked as a potential subtype of pathological and clinical significance, which has seldom been investigated systematically. This study sought to explore the clinical features, prognostic factors, and optimal treatments for LSCIS patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed with LSCIS (n=449), lung adenocarcinoma in situ (LAIS; n=1,132), stage IA lung squamous cell cancer (LSQCC; n=22,289) and stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD; n=68,523) were identified in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Additionally, 512 patients from the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital diagnosed with LSCIS (n=34), LAIS (n=248), stage IA LSQCC (n=118) and stage IA LUAD (n=112) were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to examine the overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients. Results: The univariate and multivariate analyses showed the patients with LSCIS had significantly worse survival than those with LAIS. Although, the univariate analysis revealed that the LSCIS patients had significantly worse OS and LCSS than the stage IA LSQCC patients, the multivariate analyses showed that the prognosis of the LSCIS was similar to that of the stage IA LSQCC in the SEER cohort. The prognosis of the LSCIS was similar to that of the stage IA LSQCC in the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital cohort. The univariate and multivariate analyses showed that age (>70 years) and chemotherapy were negative prognostic factors, and surgery was a favorable prognostic factor for the LSCIS patients. The survival of the LSCIS patients who underwent local tumor destruction or excision was similar to that of those who did not receive surgery. Lobectomy was the surgical procedure associated with the highest OS and LCSS in LSCIS patients. Conclusions: The survivals of the LSCIS were similar to those of the stage IA LSQCC, but significantly worse than those of the LAIS. Surgery was an independent favorable prognostic factor for the LSCIS patients. Lobectomy was a superior choice of surgical procedure, and significantly improved the current outcomes of the LSCIS patients.

Indexed as

Lung squamous cell cancer in situ (LSCIS)prognosisSurveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)treatment

Identifiers

PMID37425404
PMCPMC10326786
OpenAlexW4382400049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.