ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
Radiograph-comparable image synthesis for spine alignment analysis using deep learning with prospective clinical validation.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring radiation-free scoliosis monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis of non-ionizing methods.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- A scoping review on the application of new technology in the screening and diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- Scalable and Robust Artificial Intelligence for Spine Alignment Assessment: Multicenter Study Enabled by Real-Time Data Transformation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Development and multicenter external validation of a deep learning model for early screening of thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum on routine chest radiographs.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Idiopathic Scoliosis Progression: Presenting Rib and Segmental Rib Index as Predictors-A Literature Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- SiameseNet based on multiple instance learning for accurate identification of the histological grade of ICC tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Conditional generative adversarial network-assisted system for radiation-free evaluation of scoliosis using a single smartphone photograph: a model development and validation study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Achieving enhanced diagnostic precision in endometrial lesion analysis through a data enhancement framework.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- SpineHRformer: A Transformer-Based Deep Learning Model for Automatic Spine Deformity Assessment with Prospective Validation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common type of spinal disorder affecting children. Clinical screening and diagnosis require physical and radiographic examinations, which are either subjective or increase radiation exposure. We therefore developed and validated a radiation-free portable system and device utilising light-based depth sensing and deep learning technologies to analyse AIS by landmark detection and image synthesis. Methods: Consecutive patients with AIS attending two local scoliosis clinics in Hong Kong between October 9, 2019, and May 21, 2022, were recruited. Patients were excluded if they had psychological and/or systematic neural disorders that could influence the compliance of the study and/or the mobility of the patients. For each participant, a Red Green Blue-Depth (RGBD) image of the nude back was collected using our in-house radiation-free device. Manually labelled landmarks and alignment parameters by our spine surgeons were considered as the ground truth (GT). Images from training and internal validation cohorts (n = 1936) were used to develop the deep learning models. The model was then prospectively validated on another cohort (n = 302) which was collected in Hong Kong and had the same demographic properties as the training cohort. We evaluated the prediction accuracy of the model on nude back landmark detection as well as the performance on radiograph-comparable image (RCI) synthesis. The obtained RCIs contain sufficient anatomical information that can quantify disease severities and curve types. Findings: Our model had a consistently high accuracy in predicting the nude back anatomical landmarks with a less than 4-pixel error regarding the mean Euclidian and Manhattan distance. The synthesized RCI for AIS severity classification achieved a sensitivity and negative predictive value of over 0.909 and 0.933, and the performance for curve type classification was 0.974 and 0.908, with spine specialists' manual assessment results on real radiographs as GT. The estimated Cobb angle from synthesized RCIs had a strong correlation with the GT angles (R Interpretation: The radiation-free medical device powered by depth sensing and deep learning techniques can provide instantaneous and harmless spine alignment analysis which has the potential for integration into routine screening for adolescents. Funding: Innovation and Technology Fund (MRP/038/20X), Health Services Research Fund (HMRF) 08192266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.