Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425359›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Dynamic changes of soil microorganisms in rotation farmland at the western foot of the Greater Khingan range.

Shuli Wei, Jing Fang, Tianjiao Zhang, Jianguo Wang, Yuchen Cheng, Jie Ma, Rui Xie, Zhixiong Liu, Erhu Su, Yongfeng Ren and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shuli WeiSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Jing FangSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Tianjiao ZhangSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Jianguo WangInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Yuchen ChengInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Jie MaSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Rui XieInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Zhixiong LiuInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Erhu SuInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Yongfeng RenSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Xiaoqing ZhaoSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Xiangqian ZhangSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Zhanyuan LuSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop rotation and other tillage systems can affect soil microbial communities and functions. Few studies have reported the response of soil spatial microbial communities to rotation under drought stress. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to explore the dynamic changes of the soil space microbial community under different drought stress-rotation patterns. In this study, two water treatments were set up, control W1 (mass water content 25%-28%), and drought W2 (mass water content 9%-12%). Four crop rotation patterns were set in each water content, spring wheat continuous (R1), spring wheat-potato (R2), spring wheat-potato-rape (R3) and spring wheat-rape (R4), for a total of eight treatments (W1R1, W1R2, W1R3, W1R4, W2R1, W2R2, W2R3, W2R4). Endosphere, rhizosphere and bulk soil of spring wheat in each treatment were collected, and root space microbial community data were generated. The soil microbial community changed under different treatments and their relationship with soil factors were analyzed using a co-occurrence network, mantel test, and other methods. The results revealed that the alpha diversity of microorganisms in the rhizosphere and bulk soil did not differ significantly, but it was significantly greater than in the endosphere. The bacteria community structure was more stable, fungi alpha-diversity significant changes (

Indexed as

bacteriadrought stressfungirotation patternssoil factors

Identifiers

PMID37425359
PMCPMC10328388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.