Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425253›Full record

ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2022

A Mixed Methods Approach to Improving Provider Counseling of Patients Who Vape.

Leah M Ranney, Sarah D Kowitt, Kathleen Mottus, Susan McDowell, Amber N Beane, Sheri Denslow, Kit Sturm, Noah Rice, Michelle Hernandez, Ilona Jaspers and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leah M RanneyDepartment of Family Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Sarah D KowittDepartment of Family Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Kathleen MottusThe North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Susan McDowellUniversity of North Carolina Health Sciences at Mountain Area Health Education Center.
Amber N BeaneUniversity of North Carolina Health Sciences at Mountain Area Health Education Center.
Sheri DenslowUniversity of North Carolina Health Sciences at Mountain Area Health Education Center.
Kit SturmUniversity of North Carolina Health Sciences at Mountain Area Health Education Center.
Noah RiceUniversity of North Carolina Asheville, Asheville, NC.
Michelle HernandezDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Ilona JaspersChildren's Research Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Elise HickmanChildren's Research Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jacqueline R HalladayDepartment of Family Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of North Carolina at Asheville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Vaping is an epidemic among young people, but there is little guidance on how medical providers should counsel young adults about vaping. To address this gap, we examined how electronic health record (EHR) systems prompt providers to collect vaping data and interviewed young adults about vaping communications with providers and preferred information sources. Methods: In this mixed methods study, we used survey research methods to explore if prompts exist in EHR systems to guide discussions about vaping with youth seen in primary care. We collected primary care practice information about EHR prompts regarding e-cigarette use from 10 rural North Carolina practices from August 2020 through November 2020 and interviewed 17 young adults (age 18-21 years) who reviewed resources and provided their opinion on the resource's relevance for their age group. Interviews were stratified by vaping status, transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed. Results: Only 5 of 10 EHR systems included prompts to capture information about vaping and data capture was optional in all 5 cases. Of the 17 interviewees, 10 were female, 14 were White, 3 were non-White and the mean age was 19.6 years. Two central themes emerged. Young adults: 1) were open to confidential, non-confrontational interactions with trusted providers and supported the use of a 2-page resource/discussion guide, questionnaires about vaping, and other waiting room resources, and 2) wanted prevention and cessation resources to be age-appropriate, including medical facts from a trusted source, and to be disseminated via social media platforms used by young adults. Conclusions: We found a lack of EHR functionalities in screening for vaping status hindered patients from receiving counseling on use. Young adults report a willingness to communicate with and learn from trusted providers and to gain understanding from information accessed via social media.

Indexed as

adolescentse-cigarette usee-cig useEHRelectronic cigaretteelectronic health recordssmoking cessationsmoking preventionteensvapingyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID37425253
PMCPMC10327945
OpenAlexW4308118537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.