Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425143›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2023

Special Section Guest Editorial: Thirty Years of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

David Highton, David Boas, Yasuyo Minagawa, Rickson C Mesquita, Judit Gervain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Editorial Special Section on Biomedical Diffuse Optics for the Brain.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

David HightonPrincess Alexandra Hospital Southside Clinical Unit, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
David BoasBoston University Neurophotonics Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Yasuyo MinagawaKeio University, Department of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.
Rickson C MesquitaUniversity of Campinas, Institute of Physics, Campinas, Brazil.
Judit GervainUniversité Paris Cité, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, CNRS, Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRKeio University · JPPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a non-invasive optical technique that measures cerebral hemodynamics across multiple regions of interest, and thereby characterises brain functional activation. Since its first description in 1993, fNIRS has undergone substantial developments in hardware, analysis techniques, and applications. Thirty years later, this technique is significantly enchancing our understanding in diverse areas of neuroscience research such as neurodevelopment, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatric disorders, neurodegenerative conditions, and brain injury management in intensive care settings. This special issue outlines the latest progress in instrumentation and analysis techniques and showcases some applications within the expanding field of fNIRS over the past decade.

Identifiers

PMID37425143
PMCPMC10323008
OpenAlexW4383377560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.