Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425013›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Moving CNS axon growth and regeneration research into human model systems.

Bo P Lear, Darcie L Moore

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo P LearDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Darcie L MooreDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Establishment of a human, age-specific model for axon growth and regeneration studiesR21NS111192 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MOORE, DARCIE LEANN · 2020 to 2020
$441k
Characterization of RNA Binding Protein Regulation in Neural Stem Cell Quiescence ExitF30NS122478 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LEAR, BO PENG · 2021 to 2022
$68k
NINDS NIH HHS F30 NS122478NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS111192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axon regeneration is limited in the adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS) due to both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Rodent studies have shown that developmental age can drive differences in intrinsic axon growth ability, such that embryonic rodent CNS neurons extend long axons while postnatal and adult CNS neurons do not. In recent decades, scientists have identified several intrinsic developmental regulators in rodents that modulate growth. However, whether this developmentally programmed decline in CNS axon growth is conserved in humans is not yet known. Until recently, there have been limited human neuronal model systems, and even fewer age-specific human models. Human

Indexed as

axon growthaxon regenerationdevelopmentdirect reprogramminghPSCsreprogramming

Identifiers

PMID37425013
PMCPMC10324669
OpenAlexW4381805292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.