Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37424947›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of stem cells2023

Current overview of induced pluripotent stem cell-based blood-brain barrier-on-a-chip.

Arielly da Hora Alves, Mariana Penteado Nucci, Nicole Mastandrea Ennes do Valle, Juliana Morais Missina, Javier Bustamante Mamani, Gabriel Nery Albuquerque Rego, Olivia Furiama Metropolo Dias, Murilo Montenegro Garrigós, Fernando Anselmo de Oliveira, Lionel Fernel Gamarra

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of stem cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arielly da Hora AlvesHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05529-060, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Penteado NucciHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05529-060, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nicole Mastandrea Ennes do ValleHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05529-060, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana Morais MissinaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05529-060, São Paulo, Brazil.
Javier Bustamante MamaniHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05529-060, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriel Nery Albuquerque RegoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05529-060, São Paulo, Brazil.
Olivia Furiama Metropolo DiasHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05529-060, São Paulo, Brazil.
Murilo Montenegro GarrigósHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05529-060, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Anselmo de OliveiraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05529-060, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lionel Fernel GamarraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05529-060, São Paulo, Brazil. lgamarra@einstein.br.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInduced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) show great ability to differentiate into any tissue, making them attractive candidates for pathophysiological investigations. The rise of organ-on-a-chip technology in the past century has introduced a novel way to make

aimTo analyze the literature for BBB models on-a-chip involving iPSCs, describe the microdevices, the BBB

methodsWe searched for original articles indexed in PubMed and Scopus that used iPSCs to mimic the BBB and its microenvironment in microfluidic devices. Thirty articles were identified, wherein only 14 articles were finally selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data compiled from the selected articles were organized into four topics: (1) Microfluidic devices design and fabrication; (2) characteristics of the iPSCs used in the BBB model and their differentiation conditions; (3) BBB-on-a-chip reconstruction process; and (4) applications of BBB microfluidic three-dimensional models using iPSCs.

resultsThis study showed that BBB models with iPSCs in microdevices are quite novel in scientific research. Important technological advances in this area regarding the use of commercial BBB-on-a-chip were identified in the most recent articles by different research groups. Conventional polydimethylsiloxane was the most used material to fabricate in-house chips (57%), whereas few studies (14.3%) adopted polymethylmethacrylate. Half the models were constructed using a porous membrane made of diverse materials to separate the channels. iPSC sources were divergent among the studies, but the main line used was IMR90-C4 from human fetal lung fibroblast (41.2%). The cells were differentiated through diverse and complex processes either to endothelial or neural cells, wherein only one study promoted differentiation inside the chip. The construction process of the BBB-on-a-chip involved previous coating mostly with fibronectin/collagen IV (39.3%), followed by cell seeding in single cultures (36%) or co-cultures (64%) under controlled conditions, aimed at developing an

conclusionThis review evidenced technological advances in the construction of BBB models using iPSCs. Nonetheless, a definitive BBB-on-a-chip has not yet been achieved, hindering the applicability of the models.

Indexed as

Blood-brain barrierCell differentiationInduced pluripotent stem cellsMicrofluidic deviceNeurovascular unitOrgan-on-a-chip

Identifiers

PMID37424947
PMCPMC10324508
OpenAlexW4382065245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.