Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37424913›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Determination of lethal electric field threshold for pulsed field ablation in

Bor Kos, Lars Mattison, David Ramirez, Helena Cindrič, Daniel C Sigg, Paul A Iaizzo, Mark T Stewart, Damijan Miklavčič

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Autonomic effects and ablation success after pulsed field and cryoballoon ablation: a SINGLE SHOT CHAMPION substudy.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Thermal preconditioning of targeted tissue enhances pulsed field ablation lesions.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of efficiency of PFA catheter designs by computer modeling.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Pulsed Field Ablation: A Comprehensive Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bor KosFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Lars MattisonCardiac Ablation Solutions, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States.
David RamirezDepartment of Surgery, Visible Heart® Laboratories, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Helena CindričFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Daniel C SiggCardiac Ablation Solutions, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Paul A IaizzoDepartment of Surgery, Visible Heart® Laboratories, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Mark T StewartCardiac Ablation Solutions, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Damijan MiklavčičFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Medtronic (United States) · USUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN MUSCLE RESEARCHT32AR007612 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI JAMES M ERVASTI, DAWN A LOWE · 2001 to 2026
$11.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pulsed field ablation is an emerging modality for catheter-based cardiac ablation. The main mechanism of action is irreversible electroporation (IRE), a threshold-based phenomenon in which cells die after exposure to intense pulsed electric fields. Lethal electric field threshold for IRE is a tissue property that determines treatment feasibility and enables the development of new devices and therapeutic applications, but it is greatly dependent on the number of pulses and their duration. Methods: In the study, lesions were generated by applying IRE in porcine and human left ventricles using a pair of parallel needle electrodes at different voltages (500-1500 V) and two different pulse waveforms: a proprietary biphasic waveform (Medtronic) and monophasic 48 × 100 μs pulses. The lethal electric field threshold, anisotropy ratio, and conductivity increase by electroporation were determined by numerical modeling, comparing the model outputs with segmented lesion images. Results: The median threshold was 535 V/cm in porcine (( Discussion: The values obtained are compared with an extensive literature review of published lethal electric field thresholds in other tissues and were found to be lower than most other tissues, except for skeletal muscle. These findings, albeit preliminary, from a limited number of hearts suggest that treatments in humans with parameters optimized in pigs should result in equal or greater lesions.

Indexed as

cardiac ablationirreversible electroporationlethal electric field thresholdsmuscle anisotropypulsed field ablation

Identifiers

PMID37424913
PMCPMC10326317
OpenAlexW4381854285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.