Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37424799›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023

Visualized machine learning models combined with propensity score matching analysis in single PR-positive breast cancer prognosis: a multicenter population-based study.

Chaofan Li, Yuxin Hui, Xinyu Wei, Peizhuo Yao, Yiwei Jia, Mengjie Liu, Yusheng Wang, Jia Li, Yifan Cai, Yu Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ERFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chaofan LiDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Yuxin HuiDepartment of Dermatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Xinyu WeiDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Peizhuo YaoDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Yiwei JiaDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Mengjie LiuDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Yusheng WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Jia LiDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Yifan CaiDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Zeyao FengDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Yinbin ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Shuqun ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Chong DuDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University 157 West Fifth Street, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characteristics of single PR-positive (ER-PR+, sPR+) breast cancer (BC) and its prognosis are not well elucidated due to its rarity and conflicting evidence. There is a lack of an accurate and efficient model for predicting survival, thereby rendering treatment challenging for clinicians. Whether endocrine therapy should be intensified in sPR+ BC patients was another controversial clinical topic. We constructed and cross-validated XGBoost models that showed high precision and accuracy in predicting the survival of patients with sPR+ BC cases (1-year: AUC=0.904; 3-year: AUC=0.847; 5-year: AUC=0.824). The F1 score for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year models were 0.91, 0.88, and 0.85, respectively. The models exhibited superior performance in an external, independent dataset (1-year: AUC=0.889; 3-year: AUC=0.846; 5-year: AUC=0.821). Further, intensified endocrine therapy did not provide a significant overall survival benefit compared to initial or no endocrine therapy (P=0.600, HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.35-6.17). Propensity-score matching (PSM)-adjusted data showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the prognosis between ER-PR+HER2+ and ER-PR-HER2+ BC. Patients having the ER-PR+HER2- subtype had a slightly worse prognosis than those with the ER-PR-HER2- subtype. In conclusion, XGBoost models can be highly reproducible and effective in predicting survival in patients with sPR+ BC. Our findings revealed that patients with sPR-positive BC may not benefit from endocrine therapy. Patients with sPR+ BC may benefit from intensive adjuvant chemotherapy compared to endocrine therapy.

Indexed as

Breast cancerneoadjuvant therapySEERsingle PR-positiveXGBoost algorithm

Identifiers

PMID37424799
PMCPMC10326595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.