Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37424631›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2023

Intranasally administered extracellular vesicles from human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells quickly incorporate into neurons and microglia in 5xFAD mice.

Sahithi Attaluri, Jenny Jaimes Gonzalez, Maha Kirmani, Andrew D Vogel, Raghavendra Upadhya, Maheedhar Kodali, Leelavathi N Madhu, Shama Rao, Bing Shuai, Roshni S Babu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sahithi AttaluriInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Jenny Jaimes GonzalezInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Maha KirmaniInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Andrew D VogelInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Raghavendra UpadhyaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Maheedhar KodaliInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Leelavathi N MadhuInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Shama RaoInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Bing ShuaiInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Roshni S BabuInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Charles HuardInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Ashok K ShettyInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas, United States.
Texas A&M Health Science Center · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Intranasal Treatment of Stem Cell-derived Extracellular Vesicles for Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG074256 · NIA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI SHETTY, ASHOK K · 2022 to 2025
$3.6M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG074256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived neural stem cells (NSCs) have robust antiinflammatory and neurogenic properties due to therapeutic miRNAs and proteins in their cargo. Hence, hiPSC-NSC-EVs are potentially an excellent biologic for treating neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: This study investigated whether intranasally (IN) administered hiPSC-NSC-EVs would quickly target various neural cell types in the forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain regions of 3-month-old 5xFAD mice, a model of β-amyloidosis and familial AD. We administered a single dose of 25 × 10 Results: At 45 min post-administration, EVs were found in virtually all subregions of the forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain of naïve and 5xFAD mice, with predominant targeting and internalization into neurons, interneurons, and microglia, including plaque-associated microglia in 5xFAD mice. EVs also came in contact with the plasma membranes of astrocytic processes and the soma of oligodendrocytes in white matter regions. Evaluation of CD63/CD81 expression with the neuronal marker confirmed that PKH26 + particles found within neurons were IN administered hiPSC-NSC-EVs. At 6 h post-administration, EVs persisted in all cell types in both groups, with the distribution mostly matching what was observed at 45 min post-administration. Area fraction (AF) analysis revealed that, in both naïve and 5xFAD mice, higher fractions of EVs incorporate into forebrain regions at both time points. However, at 45 min post-IN administration, AFs of EVs within cell layers in forebrain regions and within microglia in midbrain and hindbrain regions were lower in 5xFAD mice than naïve mice, implying that amyloidosis reduces EV penetrance. Discussion: Collectively, the results provide novel evidence that IN administration of therapeutic hiPSC-NSC-EVs is an efficient avenue for directing such EVs into neurons and glia in all brain regions in the early stage of amyloidosis. As pathological changes in AD are observed in multiple brain areas, the ability to deliver therapeutic EVs into various neural cells in virtually every brain region in the early stage of amyloidosis is attractive for promoting neuroprotective and antiinflammatory effects.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseastrocytesextracellular vesicleshuman neural stem cellshuman pluripotent stem cellsinterstitial spaceintranasal administrationmicroglia

Identifiers

PMID37424631
PMCPMC10323752
OpenAlexW4381740444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.