ArticleJournal of food science and technology2023
Effect of popping and malting processing techniques on physiochemical, antinutrients and antioxidant properties of millets flour.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Intercropped Legume Flours on the Nutritional and Textural Attributes of Wheat Cakes: A Sustainable Approach to Enhanced Nutrition.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High Pressure Microfluidization: a Novel Strategy to Improve Stability and Structural Properties of Pearl Millet Drink.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Preparation ofInternational journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present investigation aimed to evaluate the effect of popping and malting on nutritional characteristics in millets. Five genotypes each of sorghum, finger millet and pearl millet were analyzed after popping and malting process. The physiochemical, antinutrients and antioxidant properties were observed in raw, popped and malted millet flours. The crude protein and energy were found to increase when popped and decrease after malting, whereas crude fibre content significantly decreased in popped and malted flours of all millets over the raw flours. A significant rise in total soluble carbohydrates was seen after raw millets were processed. Malting resulted in increase of enzymatic activities (Lipoxygenase and alpha-amylase). Alkaloids and antioxidants (FRAP, DPPH and Ascorbic acid) increased whereas starch and amylose decreased after processing techniques compared to raw flour. Total phenols and tannins increased and reduction in antinutrients i.e. phytic acid, saponins and oxalate was seen in processed millet flours over raw. The results showed that the household processing techniques i.e. popping and malting improved the nutritional composition and antioxidant potential with simultaneous decrease in antinutritional components in all millet genotypes. Raw and processed pearl millet genotype PCB-166 found to be better in terms of nutritional and antioxidant potential, and therefore, could fulfill the nutritional needs of the poor community. Further, processed millet flours could be utilized in the development of value added products. Graphical abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13197-023-05758-4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.