ReviewJournal of neuromuscular diseases2023
How is Physical Activity Measured in Spinal Muscular Atrophy and Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy?
Review in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing movement quality in individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy utilizing accelerometry: Comparisons with healthy controls.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Six-Minute Activity-95Pediatric neurology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical activity (PA) provides many substantial benefits to help reduce risk for cardiometabolic disease, improve cognitive function, and improve quality of life. Individuals with neuromuscular disorders (NMDs), such as spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are characterized by muscular weakness and fatigue, which limits the capacity to reach the recommended guidelines of PA. Measuring PA in these populations can provide insight to participation in daily activities, track disease progression, and monitor efficacy of drug treatments.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to identify how PA is measured in SMA and DMD using instrumented and self-report methods, and how these methods are employed in ambulatory and non-ambulatory groups.
methodsA scoping review was performed to identify studies that reported PA in these neuromuscular disorders. Inclusion was determined after a multi-stage review process by several reviewers, followed by an in-depth analysis of metrics reported by each tool that was used.
resultsA total of nineteen studies were identified and included in this review. Sixteen studies included instrumented measures and four studies utilized self-reported measures, with eleven studies also reporting PA information from a non-ambulatory group. A variety of metrics have been reported using both classes of measurement tools.
conclusionAlthough a wide variety of research exists that details both instrumented and self-reported measurement tools, feasibility, cost, and study aims are important factors to consider in addition to testing methodology when selecting which type of tool to use. We recommend using a combination of instrumented and self-report measures to provide context to the PA measured in these populations. Improvements in both instrumented and self-report methodologies will add valuable knowledge about the disease burden and efficacy of treatment and disease management methods in SMA and DMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.