ReviewApplied nursing research : ANR2023
Sustaining a therapeutic environment within mental health in-patient settings during COVID-19. Results of a Delphi study.
Review in Applied nursing research : ANR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimDevelop a strengths-based, person-centred, trauma-informed and recovery-oriented framework to mitigate any potential increase in conflict resulting from the implementation of C19 restrictions.
backgroundGuidance addressing the unique challenges posed by Covid-19 within mental health in-patient settings, including how to support those whose distress may present as behaviour that challenges including violence and self-harm, remains urgently needed. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A Delphi design involving four iterative stages was adopted. Stage 1 involved a review and synthesis of COVID-19-related public health and ethical guidance and a narrative literature review. A formative operational framework was then developed. Stage 2 sought to establish the face validity of the framework through engagement with frontline and senior staff in mental health services in Ireland, Denmark and Netherlands. Stage 3 investigated the content validity of the final framework through a plenary presentation and discussion of the framework at a scientific symposium of the European Violence in Psychiatric Research Group (EViPRG, 2020). Stage 4 sought expert appraisal of the framework using a structured evaluation completed by a panel of eighteen multidisciplinary experts from nine countries, including four academics, six clinicians and eight holding dual clinical/academic appointments to assess content validity.
resultsThe guidance adopts the widely advocated approach to support those whose distress may present as behaviour services find challenging in identifying the need for primary, secondary, tertiary and recovery measures. It emphasizes person-centred care while integrating specific Covid-19 public health requirements into service planning. It also aligns with contemporary best practice in in-patient mental health care, incorporating the principles of Safewards, the core values of trauma-informed care, and an explicit on recovery.
conclusionThe guidance developed has face and content validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.