Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37423642›Full record

ReviewBMJ mental health2023

Patients

Monique Kammeraat, Geeske van Rooijen, Lisette Kuijper, Julian D Kiverstein, Damiaan A J P Denys

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Psycho-oncologists' roles, tasks, and needs regarding requests for assisted suicide - a qualitative interview study on current experiences and future directions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monique KammeraatPsychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geeske van RooijenPsychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lisette KuijperPsychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Julian D KiversteinPsychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands j.d.kiverstein@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3428-8367
Damiaan A J P DenysPsychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3191-3844
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRefaja Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEuthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) for patients with psychiatric disorders occupies a prominent place in the public debate, but little is known about the psychiatric patients requesting and receiving EAS.

objectiveTo compare the social demographic and psychiatric profile of the patients who make a request for EAS and those who receive it.

methodWe carried out a review of records from 1122 patients with psychiatric disorders who have filed a potentially eligible request for EAS at Expertise Centrum for Euthanasia (EE) in the period 2012-2018.

findingsThe majority of the patients requesting EAS were single females, living independently with a comorbid diagnosis of depression with a history of undergoing psychiatric treatment for more than 10 years. From the small number of patients who went on to receive EAS in our sample, the majority were also single women, with a diagnosis of depressive disorder. A small subgroup of patients whose diagnoses included somatic disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders and neurocognitive disorders were over-represented in the group of patients receiving EAS compared with the applicant group.

conclusionThe average demographic and psychiatric profile of patients requesting and receiving EAS were found to be broadly similar. The majority of patients requesting EAS had received a comorbid diagnosis, making this a difficult-to-treat patient group. Only a small number of patients requesting had their requests granted. Patients from different diagnostic groups showed patterns in why their requests were not granted. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Many of the patients who withdrew their requests for EAS benefited from being able to discuss dying with end of life experts at EE. Health professionals can make a difference to a vulnerable group of patients, if they are trained to discuss end of life.

Indexed as

EuthanasiaMental DisordersSuicide, AssistedDeathFemaleHumansNetherlandspsychiatrysuicide & self-harm

Identifiers

PMID37423642
PMCPMC10335461
OpenAlexW4383682296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.