Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37423623›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Study protocol: the ILANA study - exploring optimal implementation strategies for long-acting antiretroviral therapy to ensure equity in clinical care and policy for women, racially minoritised people and older people living with HIV in the UK - a qualitative multiphase longitudinal study design.

Hamzah Z Farooq, Vanessa Apea, Bakita Kasadha, Sadna Ullah, Gill Hilton-Smith, Amber Haley, Jenny Scherzer, James Hand, Sara Paparini, Rachel Phillips and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05294159 (Implementing Long-Acting Novel Antiretrovirals - the ILANA Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05294159 completednot on this map

Implementing Long-Acting Novel Antiretrovirals - the ILANA Study

TypeobservationalSponsorQueen Mary University of LondonRan2022 to 2023Enrolled114ConditionsHuman Immunodeficiency VirusesArmsThe Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) and Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 6 countries.

Hamzah Z FarooqBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1361-9692
Vanessa ApeaBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Bakita KasadhaNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sadna UllahBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Gill Hilton-SmithViiV Healthcare, Middlesex, UK.
Amber HaleyViiV Healthcare, Middlesex, UK.
Jenny ScherzerViiV Healthcare, Middlesex, UK.
James HandSHARE Collaborative, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Sara PapariniSHARE Collaborative, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Rachel PhillipsPragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Chloe M OrkinBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK c.m.orkin@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6168-6745
Queen Mary University of London · GBViiV Healthcare (Spain) · ESUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB+RPV long-acting (LA)) is recommended as a treatment for HIV-1 allowing people living with HIV to receive 2 monthly injectable treatment, rather than daily pills. Providing injectable therapy in a system designed to provide and manage study participants on oral treatments poses logistical challenges namely how resources are used to accommodate patient preference within constrained health economies with capacity limitations. In this pragmatic multicentre study, we aim to understand the implementation of CAB-RPV-LA administration in two settings via mixed methods to explore perspectives of participants and the clinical team delivering CAB+RPV LA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women, racially minoritised people and older people are chronically under-represented in HIV clinical trials so the ILANA trial has set recruitment caps to ensure recruitment of 50% women, 50% ethnically diverse people and 30% over 50 years of age to include a more representative study population. Using a mixed-methods approach, the primary objective is to identify and evaluate the critical implementation strategies for CAB+RPV LA in both hospital and community settings. Secondary objectives include evaluating feasibility and acceptability of CAB+RPV LA administration at UK clinics and community settings from the perspective of HIV care providers, nurses and representatives at community sites, evaluating barriers to implementation, the utility of implementation strategies and adherence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 22/PR/0318). The dissemination strategy has been formulated with the SHARE Collaborative Community Advisory Board to maximise the impact of this work on clinical care and policy. This strategy draws on and leverages existing resources within the participating organisations, such as their academic infrastructure, professional relationships and community networks. The strategy will leverage the Public Engagement Team and press office to support dissemination of findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05294159.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPolicyRilpivirineUnited KingdomAnti-HIV AgentsRilpivirineGENITOURINARY MEDICINEHIV & AIDSINFECTIOUS DISEASESMEDICAL ETHICSProtocols & guidelinesQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID37423623
PMCPMC10335540
OpenAlexW4383682476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.