Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37422854›Full record

ArticleJMIR infodemiology2023

Using Machine Learning Technology (Early Artificial Intelligence-Supported Response With Social Listening Platform) to Enhance Digital Social Understanding for the COVID-19 Infodemic: Development and Implementation Study.

Becky K White, Arnault Gombert, Tim Nguyen, Brian Yau, Atsuyoshi Ishizumi, Laura Kirchner, Alicia León, Harry Wilson, Giovanna Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Jesus Cerquides and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Becky K WhiteDepartment of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3234-1742
Arnault GombertCitibeats, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6643-810X
Tim NguyenDepartment of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6186-9362
Brian YauDepartment of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-9243
Atsuyoshi IshizumiDepartment of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9678-5372
Laura KirchnerCitibeats, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2196-7901
Alicia LeónCitibeats, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0071-6898
Harry WilsonCitibeats, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0690-8243
Giovanna Jaramillo-GutierrezCitibeats, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5276-9140
Jesus CerquidesArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, Spanish Council for Scientific Research, Cerdanyola, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3752-644X
Marcelo D'AgostinoInformation Systems for Health, Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health, Pan American Health Organization and World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas, Washington DC, DC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6083-7713
Cristiana SalviRisk Communication and Community Engagement Unit, Health Emergencies Division, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8434-483X
Ravi Shankar SreenathRisk Communication and Community Engagement Unit, Health Emergencies Division, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4015-2989
Kimberly RambaudRisk Communication and Community Engagement Unit, Health Emergencies Division, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4446-8118
Dalia SamhouriCountry Health Emergency Preparedness and International Health Regulations (2005), World Health Organization Regional Office for Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3111-7004
Sylvie BriandDepartment of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6929-5335
Tina D PurnatDepartment of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0257-6631

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmid the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a need for rapid social understanding to inform infodemic management and response. Although social media analysis platforms have traditionally been designed for commercial brands for marketing and sales purposes, they have been underused and adapted for a comprehensive understanding of social dynamics in areas such as public health. Traditional systems have challenges for public health use, and new tools and innovative methods are required. The World Health Organization Early Artificial Intelligence-Supported Response with Social Listening (EARS) platform was developed to overcome some of these challenges.

objectiveThis paper describes the development of the EARS platform, including data sourcing, development, and validation of a machine learning categorization approach, as well as the results from the pilot study.

methodsData for EARS are collected daily from web-based conversations in publicly available sources in 9 languages. Public health and social media experts developed a taxonomy to categorize COVID-19 narratives into 5 relevant main categories and 41 subcategories. We developed a semisupervised machine learning algorithm to categorize social media posts into categories and various filters. To validate the results obtained by the machine learning-based approach, we compared it to a search-filter approach, applying Boolean queries with the same amount of information and measured the recall and precision. Hotelling T

resultsThe EARS platform was developed, validated, and applied to characterize conversations regarding COVID-19 since December 2020. A total of 215,469,045 social posts were collected for processing from December 2020 to February 2022. The machine learning algorithm outperformed the Boolean search filters method for precision and recall in both English and Spanish languages (P<.001). Demographic and other filters provided useful insights on data, and the gender split of users in the platform was largely consistent with population-level data on social media use.

conclusionsThe EARS platform was developed to address the changing needs of public health analysts during the COVID-19 pandemic. The application of public health taxonomy and artificial intelligence technology to a user-friendly social listening platform, accessible directly by analysts, is a significant step in better enabling understanding of global narratives. The platform was designed for scalability; iterations and new countries and languages have been added. This research has shown that a machine learning approach is more accurate than using only keywords and has the benefit of categorizing and understanding large amounts of digital social data during an infodemic. Further technical developments are needed and planned for continuous improvements, to meet the challenges in the generation of infodemic insights from social media for infodemic managers and public health professionals.

Indexed as

AI text analyticsartificial intelligenceCOVID-19infodemicinformation voidsmachine learningnarrative analysisnatural language processingpandemic preparednesspandemic responsepublic healthsentimentsocial listeningsocial media

Identifiers

PMID37422854
PMCPMC10477919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.