Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37422681›Full record

ArticleFungal biology and biotechnology2023

Rapid and robust squashed spore/colony PCR of industrially important fungi.

Guoliang Yuan, Jeffrey J Czajka, Ziyu Dai, Dehong Hu, Kyle R Pomraning, Beth A Hofstad, Joonhoon Kim, Ana L Robles, Shuang Deng, Jon K Magnuson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guoliang YuanChemical and Biological Processes Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Jeffrey J CzajkaChemical and Biological Processes Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Ziyu DaiChemical and Biological Processes Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Dehong HuChemical and Biological Processes Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Kyle R PomraningChemical and Biological Processes Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Beth A HofstadChemical and Biological Processes Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Joonhoon KimChemical and Biological Processes Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Ana L RoblesChemical and Biological Processes Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.
Shuang DengChemical and Biological Processes Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA. Shuang.Deng@pnnl.gov.
Jon K MagnusonChemical and Biological Processes Development Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA. Jon.Magnuson@pnnl.gov.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory · US

Funding

the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) DE-NL0030038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFungi have been utilized for centuries in medical, agricultural, and industrial applications. Development of systems biology techniques has enabled the design and metabolic engineering of these fungi to produce novel fuels, chemicals, and enzymes from renewable feedstocks. Many genetic tools have been developed for manipulating the genome and creating mutants rapidly. However, screening and confirmation of transformants remain an inefficient step within the design, build, test, and learn cycle in many industrial fungi because extracting fungal genomic DNA is laborious, time-consuming, and involves toxic chemicals.

resultsIn this study we developed a rapid and robust technique called "Squash-PCR" to break open the spores and release fungal genomic DNA as a template for PCR. The efficacy of Squash-PCR was investigated in eleven different filamentous fungal strains. Clean PCR products with high yields were achieved in all tested fungi. Spore age and type of DNA polymerase did not affect the efficiency of Squash-PCR. However, spore concentration was found to be the crucial factor for Squash-PCR in Aspergillus niger, with the dilution of starting material often resulting in higher PCR product yield. We then further evaluated the applicability of the squashing procedure for nine different yeast strains. We found that Squash-PCR can be used to improve the quality and yield of colony PCR in comparison to direct colony PCR in the tested yeast strains.

conclusionThe developed technique will enhance the efficiency of screening transformants and accelerate genetic engineering in filamentous fungi and yeast.

Indexed as

Colony PCRQuick screeningSpore concentrationSpore PCRSquash preparation

Identifiers

PMID37422681
PMCPMC10329332
OpenAlexW4383619507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.