ArticleTrials2023
Effects of low-dose intravenous heparin therapy in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized controlled clinical trial protocol.
Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05696639 (Cerebral Venous Assessment on Brain Swelling in Patients With Aneurysm Subarachnoid Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cerebral Venous Assessment on Brain Swelling in Patients With Aneurysm Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Retrospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of thrombocyte count dynamics after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage to predict cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia: a retrospective monocentric cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Beyond nimodipine: advanced neuroprotection strategies for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia.Neurosurgical review · 2024Review
- Early prophylactic heparin use is associated with reduced mortality in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeparin anticoagulation therapy is a widely used method to prevent cerebral vasospasm (CV) and venous thrombosis in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Subcutaneous heparin injection is considered safe and effective, whereas continuous intravenous heparin infusion is still being debated due to the risk of bleeding. Although most retrospective studies have confirmed the safety and effectiveness of unfractionated heparin (UFH) after aneurysm embolization therapy and its ability to reduce CV, there is still no randomized clinical trial comparing UFH and subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) injection in this population. Therefore, this study aims to compare the clinical outcomes associated with these two treatment approaches.
methodsThe study is an open-label, single-center, randomized controlled trial and aims to recruit 456 patients, with 228 patients in each group. The primary outcome was CV; the second outcomes measures are occurrence of bleeding events, ischemic events, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, deep vein thrombosis, cerebral venous circulation time, brain edema score, and hydrocephalus incidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol obtained ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Baoan People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong (approval number: BYL20220805). This work will be published in peer-reviewed international medical journals and presented at medical conferences.
trial registrationClinicalTrials ID: NCT05696639. Registered on March 30, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.