Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37422654›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2023

Exploring the perioperative infection control practices & incidence of surgical site infections in rural India.

Anveshi Nayan, Bhakti Sarang, Monty Khajanchi, Nobhojit Roy, Gnanaraj Jesudian, Nandakumar Menon, Mulki Patil, Raman Kataria, Ravikumar Manoharan, Rajesh Tongaonkar and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anveshi NayanSeth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Bhakti SarangDepartment of Surgery, Terna Medical College & Hospital, New Mumbai, India.
Monty KhajanchiWHO Collaboration Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India.
Nobhojit RoyWHO Collaboration Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India. nobhojit.roy@ki.se.
Gnanaraj JesudianAssociation of Rural Surgeons of India, Chennai, India.
Nandakumar MenonDepartment of Surgery, ASHWINI Gudalur Adivasi Hospital, Gudalur, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mulki PatilDepartment of Surgery, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, India.
Raman KatariaDepartment of Surgery, Jan Swasthya Sahyog, Bilaspur, Chattisgarh, India.
Ravikumar ManoharanDepartment of Surgery, Tribal Health Initiative, Sittilingi, Tamilnadu, India.
Rajesh TongaonkarDepartment of Surgery, Dr Tongaonkar Hospital, Dondaicha, Dhule, India.
Ya DevDepartment of Surgery, Government Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Anita GadgilWHO Collaboration Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical site infections (SSIs) affect around a third of patients undergoing surgeries worldwide, annually. It is heterogeneously distributed with a higher burden in low and middle-income countries. Although rural and semi-urban hospitals cater to 60-70% of the Indian population, scarce data regarding SSI rates are available from such hospitals. The study aimed to determine the prevalent SSI prevention practices and existing SSI rates in the smaller rural and semi-urban hospitals in India.

methodsThis is a prospective study performed in two phases involving surgeons and their hospitals from Indian rural and semi-urban regions. In the first phase, a questionnaire was administered to surgeons enquiring into the perioperative SSI prevention practices and five interested hospitals were recruited for phase two which documented the rate of SSIs and factors affecting them.

resultsThere was full compliance towards appropriate perioperative sterilisation practices and postoperative mop count practice at the represented hospitals. But prophylactic antimicrobials were continued in the postoperative period in more than 80% of the hospitals. The second phase of our study documented an overall SSI rate of 7.0%. The SSI rates were influenced by the surgical wound class with dirty wounds recording six times higher rate of infection than clean cases.

conclusionsSSI prevention practices and protocols were in place in all the less-resourced hospitals surveyed. The SSI rates are comparable or lower than other LMIC settings. However, this is accompanied by poor implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship guidelines.

Indexed as

HospitalsSurgical Wound InfectionHumansIncidenceInfection ControlProspective StudiesDeveloping countriesLow and middle-income countriesPerioperative SSI prevention practices.Rural hospitalsSSIsSurgical Site infection

Identifiers

PMID37422654
PMCPMC10329309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.