ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023
Relationship between gait parameter and spinal sagittal profiles in asymptomatic subjects.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of compensatory behaviors of the thoracic spine and pelvis between asymptomatic individuals and adult spinal deformity patients with sagittal imbalance when lumbar lordosis changes: a propensity score-matched retrospective analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo study the gait parameters in asymptomatic volunteers and investigate the correlation between the gait and several radiographic sagittal profiles.
methodsAsymptomatic volunteers (20-50 years of age) were included and allocated into three subgroups depending on pelvic incidence (low, normal, and high). Standing whole spine radiographs and gait analysis data were obtained. The Pearson Coefficient Correlation was used to determine the relationship between the gait and radiographic profiles.
resultsA total of 55 volunteers (28 male and 27 females) were included. The mean age was 27.35 ± 6.37 years old. The average sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL) were 37.78 ± 6.59, 14.51 ± 9.19 degrees, and 52.29 ± 10.87 degrees and - 0.36 ± 11.41, respectively. The mean velocity and stride of all the volunteers were 119.00 ± 30.12 cm/s and 130.25 ± 7.72 cm, correspondingly. The correlation between each of the radiographical and gait parameters was low (ranging from - 0.24 to 0.26).
conclusionGait parameters were not differenced significantly between each of the PI subgroups in asymptomatic volunteers. Spinal sagittal parameters also showed a low correlation with gait parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.