Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37422637›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Tools for measuring individual self-care capability: a scoping review.

Austen El-Osta, Eva Riboli Sasco, Evelina Barbanti, Iman Webber, Aos Alaa, Manisha Karki, Marie Line El Asmar, Haitham Idriss, Mashael Almadi, Farah Massoud and 2 more

RetractedAbstract readScoping ReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Monitoring and evaluation instruments of individual health in community settings: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Austen El-OstaSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK. a.el-osta@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-4938
Eva Riboli SascoSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9922-9125
Evelina BarbantiSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5730-0333
Iman WebberSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1690-0121
Aos AlaaSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6130-5092
Manisha KarkiSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6996-8915
Marie Line El AsmarSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0733-3911
Haitham IdrissSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-1266
Mashael AlmadiSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7370-7432
Farah MassoudSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-259X
Ahmed AlboksmatySelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-3609
Azeem MajeedSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Department of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 323 Reynolds BuildingSt Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-9858

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur ability to self-care can play a crucial role in the prevention, management and rehabilitation of diverse conditions, including chronic non-communicable diseases. Various tools have been developed to support the measurement of self-care capabilities of healthy individuals, those experiencing everyday self-limiting conditions, or one or more multiple long-term conditions. We sought to characterise the various non-mono-disease specific self-care measurement tools for adults as such a review was lacking.

objectiveThe aim of the review was to identify and characterise the various non-mono-disease specific self-care measurement tools for adults. Secondary objectives were to characterise these tools in terms of their content, structure and psychometric properties.

designScoping review with content assessment.

methodsThe search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases using a variety of MeSH terms and keywords covering 1 January 1950 to 30 November 2022. Inclusion criteria included tools assessing health literacy, capability and/or performance of general health self-care practices and targeting adults. We excluded tools targeting self-care in the context of disease management only or indicated to a specific medical setting or theme. We used the Seven Pillars of Self-Care framework to inform the qualitative content assessment of each tool.

resultsWe screened 26,304 reports to identify 38 relevant tools which were described in 42 primary reference studies. Descriptive analysis highlighted a temporal shift in the overall emphasis from rehabilitation-focused to prevention-focused tools. The intended method of administration also transitioned from observe-and-interview style methods to the utilisation of self-reporting tools. Only five tools incorporated questions relevant to the seven pillars of self-care.

conclusionsVarious tools exist to measure individual self-care capability, but few consider assessing capability against all seven pillars of self-care. There is a need to develop a comprehensive, validated tool and easily accessible tool to measure individual self-care capability including the assessment of a wide range of self-care practices. Such a tool could be used to inform targeted health and social care interventions.

Indexed as

Health LiteracySelf CareAdultHealth StatusHumansAssessmentInstrumentMeasurementProxy-measureScaleSelf-careTool

Identifiers

PMID37422637
PMCPMC10329804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.