Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37422625›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Implementing community-based health program in conflict settings: documenting experiences from the Central African Republic and South Sudan.

Faiza Rab, Donya Razavi, Mariam Kone, Salim Sohani, Mekdes Assefa, Muhammad Haaris Tiwana, Rodolfo Rossi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Faiza RabDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. faiza.rab@redcross.ca.
Donya RazaviDepartment of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9501-4768
Mariam KoneHealth in Emergencies, Canadian Red Cross, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Salim SohaniHealth in Emergencies, Canadian Red Cross, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mekdes AssefaHealth in Emergencies, Canadian Red Cross, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7809-6984
Muhammad Haaris TiwanaMasters of Public Health , University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Rodolfo RossiHealth Unit, International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7761-7162
Canadian Red Cross Society · CAWestern University · CAInternational Committee of the Red Cross · CHMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe delivery of quality healthcare for women and children in conflict-affected settings remains a challenge that cannot be mitigated unless global health policymakers and implementers find an effective modality in these contexts. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the Canadian Red Cross (CRC) used an integrated public health approach to pilot a program for delivering community-based health services in the Central African Republic (CAR) and South Sudan in partnership with National Red Cross Societies in both countries. This study explored the feasibility, barriers, and strategies for context-specific agile programming in armed conflict affected settings.

methodsA qualitative study design with key informant interviews and focus group discussions using purposive sampling was used for this study. Focus groups with community health workers/volunteers, community elders, men, women, and adolescents in the community and key informant interviews with program implementers were conducted in CAR and South Sudan. Data were analyzed by two independent researchers using a content analysis approach.

resultsIn total, 15 focus groups and 16 key informant interviews were conducted, and a total of 169 people participated in the study. The feasibility of service delivery in armed conflict settings depends on well-defined and clear messaging, community inclusiveness and a localized plan for delivery of services. Security and knowledge gaps, including language barriers and gaps in literacy negatively impacted service delivery. Empowering women and adolescents and providing context-specific resources can mitigate some barriers. Community engagement, collaboration and negotiating safe passage, comprehensive delivery of services and continued training were key strategies identified for agile programming in conflict settings.

conclusionUsing an integrative community-based approach to health service delivery in CAR and South Sudan is feasible for humanitarian organizations operating in conflict-affected areas. For agile, and responsive implementation of health services in conflict-affected settings, decision-makers should focus on effectively engaging communities, bridge inequities through the engagement of vulnerable groups, collaborate and negotiate for safe passage for delivery of services, keep logistical and resource constraints in consideration and contextualize service delivery with the support of local actors.

Indexed as

Public HealthAdolescentAgedCanadaCentral African RepublicChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleSouth SudanAgile and responsive programingArmed conflictCommunity based health servicesCommunity engagementProtracted conflictReproductive Maternal Neonatal Child and Adolescent health servicesRMNCAHSouth SudanThe Central African Republic

Identifiers

PMID37422625
PMCPMC10329391
OpenAlexW4383620111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.