Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37422493›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Field attraction of Eurydema ornata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) to allyl isothiocyanate.

Sándor Koczor, Miklós Tóth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sándor KoczorDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, Budapest, Hungary. koczor.sandor@atk.hu.ORCID 0000-0002-8751-157X
Miklós TóthDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-4948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several Eurydema species (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) are considered as pests, however, reports on their chemical ecology are scarce. In the current study we focused on Eurydema ornata (Linnaeus) a pentatomid pest of several brassicaceous crops. Since the species is known to feed preferably on generative parts of plants, a series of floral and green leaf volatiles were tested by electroantennography and compounds eliciting remarkable responses were also tested in the field. Three compounds elicited the most outstanding responses from antennae of E. ornata: allyl isothiocyanate, phenylacetaldehyde and ± linalool. Field experiments were conducted in Hungary between 2017 and 2021 to test the potential attractive effects of the compounds. Three Eurydema species were caught in the experiments E. ornata, E. oleracea (Linnaeus) and E. ventralis Kolenati. In the experiments combinations containing allyl isothiocyanate attracted both males and females of E. ornata. The compound was also attractive on its own, in a positive, dose-dependent manner. When presented alone, neither phenylacetaldehyde nor ± linalool was attractive to the species, furthermore, addition of these compounds to allyl isothiocyanate did not affect attraction considerably. To our knowledge this is the first demonstration of field attration of an Eurydema species to a semiochemical and one of the few reports on trapping of a pentatomid species with a synthetic plant volatile in the field. Perspectives regarding research and potential practical applications are discussed in the paper.

Indexed as

HemipteraHeteropteraVolatile Organic CompoundsAcetaldehydeAcyclic MonoterpenesAnimalsFemaleIsothiocyanatesMaleAcetaldehydeAcyclic Monoterpenesallyl isothiocyanateIsothiocyanateslinaloolphenylacetaldehydeVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID37422493
PMCPMC10329670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.